The name monkeypox has recently become a topic of significant discussion, raising questions about whether health authorities and organizations are considering changing it. The virus, which has caused outbreaks in various parts of the world, carries a name that some experts argue is misleading and potentially stigmatizing.
As more cases are reported, there is growing awareness of the impact a disease’s name can have on public perception and social implications. Names that seem to single out animals or regions can inadvertently foster misinformation or discrimination.
Understanding whether the name “monkeypox” will be changed requires examining the reasoning behind the current name, concerns raised by communities, and the steps organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) are taking.
The process of renaming a disease involves balancing scientific accuracy, cultural sensitivity, and public communication. As we explore this topic, it becomes clear that the naming of diseases is not just a matter of semantics but a reflection of how society approaches health and disease awareness.
The Origin of the Name Monkeypox
The name monkeypox dates back to when the virus was first discovered in laboratory monkeys in 1958. Despite its name, monkeys are not the primary carriers of the virus.
The name was originally chosen because the virus was isolated from monkeys, but it has since been found in various other animals, including rodents.
Monkeypox is a zoonotic disease, meaning it can spread from animals to humans. The virus was first identified in humans in the 1970s in Central and West Africa.
Because of the initial discovery in monkeys, the name stuck, even though it does not fully represent the virus’s natural reservoir or transmission pathways.
Many scientists and public health experts now acknowledge that the name may be misleading. It can create unnecessary fear or stigma related to monkeys or specific regions.
This has led to calls for a more accurate and culturally sensitive name that better reflects the nature of the disease.
“Names have power. They can shape fear, stigma, and misinformation. It’s crucial we choose words that inform rather than alienate.”
Why the Name Matters
- Scientific clarity: Accurate names help in understanding the disease’s transmission and origin.
- Reducing stigma: Avoiding names that target animals or places prevents social and economic harm.
- Global cooperation: Neutral names foster better international collaboration during outbreaks.
Concerns Over Stigma and Discrimination
One of the primary reasons for considering a name change is to combat stigma associated with the term “monkeypox.” Names tied to animals or geographic locations can lead to misunderstanding and discrimination against communities or species.
During the recent outbreaks, there have been reports of prejudice against people from certain regions, as well as unwarranted fear towards monkeys. This parallels previous instances where diseases named after places or animals caused social harm, such as the “Spanish flu” or “swine flu.”
Stigma can have serious consequences, including reluctance to seek medical care, underreporting of cases, and social isolation for affected individuals. Health officials aim to promote a name that encourages openness and support rather than fear.
“Changing a disease’s name is more than semantics; it’s about respecting affected communities and fostering public trust.”
- Stigma may lead to delayed treatment and spread of the virus.
- Discrimination can worsen mental health outcomes for patients.
- Neutral naming helps ensure better public health responses.
WHO’s Role in Renaming Diseases
The World Health Organization (WHO) has a formal process for naming diseases and has increasingly emphasized the importance of neutral and non-stigmatizing names.
In 2015, WHO issued guidelines for naming new human infectious diseases, advising against using geographic locations, people’s names, or animals to avoid negative impacts. This policy has influenced the current discussions around monkeypox.
Recently, WHO has shown openness to revising the name monkeypox to align with these principles. The organization is consulting experts, virologists, and affected communities to choose a name that is descriptive yet sensitive.
Criteria for New Disease Names
| Criteria | Description |
| Neutrality | The name should avoid geographic, cultural, or animal references. |
| Scientific Accuracy | Must reflect the disease’s characteristics and causative agent. |
| Pronounceability | Names should be easy to say and remember globally. |
| Non-stigmatizing | Should avoid terms that may cause offense or discrimination. |
Alternatives Being Considered
Experts are currently exploring alternative names for monkeypox that better represent the virus and reduce stigma. Some proposals focus on the scientific taxonomy of the virus, while others suggest neutral, descriptive terms.
One potential approach is to name the disease after the virus strain or family, such as using “mpox,” a shortened and less stigmatizing term that has gained some traction in media and health communications.
Other suggestions include names that emphasize symptoms or clinical features rather than animal associations. This approach follows the precedent set by diseases like COVID-19, which refers to the year of discovery rather than any location or species.
- Mpox – A shortened, neutral form currently in informal use.
- Orthopoxvirus infection – A more technical term based on the virus family.
- Human poxvirus disease – A descriptive name focusing on the human impact.
Implications of Changing the Name
Changing a disease name is not a simple task; it involves scientific, public health, and communication challenges. While renaming monkeypox could reduce stigma, it also requires updating medical literature, public awareness materials, and diagnostic protocols.
Healthcare providers and the public need clear, consistent messaging to avoid confusion. A name change demands coordinated efforts across countries and organizations, ensuring that the new term is adopted widely and rapidly.
Moreover, changing the name can influence research funding and media coverage, potentially affecting how seriously the disease is taken by policymakers and the public.
“A well-chosen name can enhance public understanding and the effectiveness of health interventions.”
Public and Media Response
The media plays a critical role in shaping public perception of diseases. The use of the term “monkeypox” in news reports and social media has been scrutinized for both accuracy and sensitivity.
Many outlets have begun using the term “mpox” or explaining the rationale behind the name change discussions to educate audiences. Public response has been mixed, with some individuals welcoming the change as a positive step, while others express concerns about confusion and resistance to new terminology.
Educating the public on the reasons behind the name change is essential to ensure acceptance and to prevent misinformation. This includes clarifying that the disease remains the same regardless of the name.
- Media adoption of new names varies by region and outlet.
- Public education campaigns help ease the transition.
- Clear communication reduces the risk of misinformation.
Comparing Disease Naming Practices
Looking at how other diseases have been named or renamed provides valuable insight into the process and challenges. Several diseases have undergone name changes to address stigma and inaccuracies.
| Disease | Original Name | Reason for Change | New Name |
| COVID-19 | Wuhan Coronavirus | Avoided geographic stigma | COVID-19 |
| Swine Flu | H1N1 Influenza | Prevented economic harm to pork industry | H1N1 Influenza |
| Monkeypox (proposed) | Monkeypox | Reduce animal and regional stigma | Mpox (tentative) |
These examples demonstrate how thoughtful naming can help manage public reaction and support effective disease control efforts.
Looking Ahead: What to Expect
While no official final decision has been made on renaming monkeypox, the momentum for change is clear. We can expect health authorities to announce an official new name soon, following expert consultations and public input.
Once a new name is adopted, the focus will shift to widespread education and communication to ensure smooth transition. This will involve collaboration between governments, media, and healthcare organizations globally.
In the meantime, it’s important for everyone to stay informed and understand that the virus itself has not changed; only the terminology is evolving to reflect a more compassionate and accurate understanding.
If you want to learn more about the importance of names and their origins, you might find it interesting to explore What Are the Seven Names of God? Meanings and Origins or dive into how to write scientific names correctly, which touches on naming conventions in science.
For a lighter take on names and identity, check out Is Your Name a Dog Name? Find Out What It Says About You.
The conversation around monkeypox’s name is a reminder of the power words hold. By choosing a name that is both scientifically accurate and free of stigma, we pave the way for better understanding, empathy, and global unity in fighting infectious diseases.
